In partnership with
AI WELLBEING + SELF GROWTH
CONSTRUCTED BY AI 🤖 | 👱 CREATED BY HUMANS
⚡ One Idea This Week ⚡
You may have seen her one your socials, even if the name doesn't ring a bell.
The Glucose Goddess.
Jessie Inchauspé, a French biochemist with five million followers and a hit TV show, has half the internet "putting clothes on their carbs" and taping little white sensors to their arms to watch their blood sugar in real time.
She took one boring number and has made it a global obsession.
And the thing everyone is chasing, the reason they're wearing monitors and reordering their plates, is a single daily enemy you know intimately…
The 3pm crash.
That mental and physical fog that rolls in like a tiresome tsunami after lunch.
You know:
The deep, heavy eyes.
The lethargic lump of your body.
The way your clearest hours slip away.
The way you drift to the kitchen for a biscuit and coffee you don’t really want.
And it costs you more than a sugary snack.
Your focus disappears.
Your energy is at 7% battery life.
You’re short with your work colleagues.
And by the time you get home, there's not much of you left for the people who matter most.
But if you could just get that crash under control, you’d get those hours back.
Your afternoons.
Your patience.
Your relaxed evenings.
But here's the thing, you've probably already tried to fix this.
Maybe you've swapped your lunch for a salad, cut the sugar from your coffee, eaten your vegetables first the way the Glucose Goddess tells you to, or even stuck one of those monitors on your arm for a fortnight.
And the crash still showed up, right on schedule, like it hadn't read any of the same advice you had.
That's not because you did it wrong.
It's because almost everyone, you, the internet, and the Glucose Goddess included, has been blaming the wrong thing for it.
The Villain Isn’t the Sugar High
Here's what most of you believe: you ate something sweet, your blood sugar spiked, and the crash is the comedown from the high.
Reasonable.
Rationale.
And also wrong.
Or at least it is only half the story.
In 2021, researchers behind what has been called the ZOE study (published in Nature Metabolism) strapped continuous glucose monitors to more than a thousand healthy people and tracked them across 8,624 identical test meals and 71,715 real ones.
It was the largest study of its kind.
Ever.
And what they found flipped the whole idea of what truly causes the mid afternoon crash on it’s head. It was not the peak after a meal that predicted how hungry, tired and biscuit-hungry you'd feel two hours later.
It was the dip.
The people who were "big dippers" felt hungrier sooner, ate more across the whole day, and hit the wall harder.
And there is also one important distinction here.
The ZOE study linked larger post-meal glucose dips with greater hunger and eating more later in the day. It did not show that those dips were what made people feel sleepy or mentally foggy.
That matters, because the classic mid-afternoon slump has other possible contributors too. Your natural circadian rhythm dips in the afternoon whether you ate lunch or not, and sleep, caffeine, meal size, hydration and movement can all change how that hour feels.
So the useful conclusion is not:
“My blood sugar crash is causing my 3pm fog.”
It’s:
“My lunch may be making an existing afternoon dip better or worse and that’s something I can test.”
That’s a much more interesting question anyway, because now you do not need to diagnose yourself, you only need to change one thing and see what your own afternoon does.
The bigger the dip, the sooner people in the study tended to feel hungry again and the more they ate later. But that does’nt mean every 3pm slump is a blood-sugar crash.
Your afternoon dip can have several causes, and lunch may simply be one of the things making it better or worse.
And that changes the question.
Instead of asking:
“How do I stop my blood sugar crashing?”
Ask:
“Is the lunch I already eat amplifying my afternoon dip and what happens if I change one thing?”
That’s something you can test.
That's The ONE Well Wired Idea This Week.
That 3pm crash is not automatically a willpower problem, and it is not safe to assume that blood sugar is the whole explanation either.
Your natural afternoon dip is real.
But your lunch may be amplifying it.
And that’s the best, most useful part, because you can test it.
Not with a diet overhaul.
Not with dozens of glucose hacks.
Not by guessing what your body’s doing.
With one small change to a meal you already eat, held steady for a few days, and one question:
“Does my afternoon really feel different?”
That’s where AI comes in. Not as a clinical nutritionist or a GP telling you why you crash, but as a patient experiment partner who can help you change one variable at a time until you find out what is causing your crash.
Why The Influencer Hacks Only Half Work
It’s a big claim, that your fix has to be built around you and not a rule off the internet. And it’s exactly why the most-followed blood-sugar advice on the planet, The Glucose Goddess included, only half-works for you.
But you’re probably asking, why should I trust the “built around you” advice over a woman with five million followers?
Because the same ZOE data carries a second, humbling finding: the same meal sends different people on wildly different rides. Identical cookies: one person's blood sugar barely moves, the next is launched up a peak and dropped down a hole.
Your response is as individual as your fingerprint.
That's the flaw in "put fibre before your carbs" and "vinegar before every meal."
They're not wrong, they're just generic.
A one-size rule for a body that comes in every size, just won’t work for every body. It's why nutritionists have pushed back on some of the hackier claims, and they have a point.
Michael Pollan said the sanest thing anyone has said about food:
"Eat food. Not too much. Mostly plants."
You don't need dozens of rules, you need a few real-food moves, aimed at your rollercoaster, not a stranger's. And that’s the one job a generic influencer can never do for you, but a patient, primed AI, fed the data about your daily meals, can.
Before you paste anything into a chat window, though, one honest thing worth saying.
AI is not a blood test.
It can't measure your glucose, and anyone who tells you it can is selling you something.
What it's genuinely good at is something simpler and, for most people, more useful: taking the lunch you already eat and the afternoon you already have, and helping you design one small, personal experiment to find out what's actually causing your crash.
Not a diagnosis.
A test of one, built around your real day.
The whole idea in one picture: the ride you're on, and the ride you want.
The Practice: The 3pm Crash Fix
You don’t need AI to diagnose your blood sugar, and, without real measurements, it can’t.
What it can do is something much more useful: look at the lunch you already eat, the way your afternoon truly feels, and help you design one small experiment that changes as little as possible.
Because your 3pm slump may have several contributors: sleep, your natural afternoon dip in alertness, lunch size and composition, caffeine, hydration, or some combination of them all.
So we’re not going to pretend we know the culprit, we’re going to change one variable, watch what happens, and let your own afternoon give you the answer.
This is not a diet overhaul.
Not a glucose obsession.
And you won’t need twenty new food rules.
Just…
One lunch.
One change.
One week.
Here’s the prompt.
Paste this into ChatGPT or Claude.
[ Start of Prompt ]
You are my **practical food-experiment partner**.
Your job is to help me test whether a **small change to a lunch I already eat** might improve how steady, hungry and alert I feel during the afternoon.
You are not here to put me on a diet, optimise my body, help me lose weight, or give me dozens of food rules.
The goal is:
**One meal.
One change.
One short experiment.**
## An important accuracy rule
Do **not** assume that my afternoon slump is caused by blood glucose.
Without appropriate measurements and clinical assessment, neither you nor I can know that.
Mid-afternoon tiredness can have multiple contributors, including:
* normal circadian changes in alertness;
* inadequate or poor-quality sleep;
* meal composition or meal size;
* hunger;
* caffeine timing;
* hydration;
* activity;
* other individual factors.
You may explain that a food change **could** affect post-meal glucose, hunger or energy, but never tell me:
* “your glucose is spiking”;
* “your blood sugar is crashing”;
* “you have reactive hypoglycaemia”;
* or similar;
unless I provide appropriate medically interpreted evidence.
Treat everything as a **hypothesis to test**, not a diagnosis.
---
## SAFETY CHECK
Before suggesting an experiment, establish whether this exercise is appropriate.
If I tell you I:
* have diabetes or pre-diabetes;
* use insulin or glucose-lowering medication;
* am pregnant;
* have a current or past eating disorder or significant restrictive eating;
* have had bariatric or other relevant gastrointestinal surgery;
* have diagnosed hypoglycaemia or another condition affecting blood glucose;
* have important food allergies or another medical diet;
* or have been given dietary instructions by a clinician;
do not personalise this food experiment.
Tell me this is better worked through with my GP or an appropriately qualified dietitian who knows my circumstances.
Also stop and recommend appropriate medical advice if I describe recurrent or severe symptoms such as fainting, marked confusion, severe dizziness, shaking or sweating, particularly if I suspect low blood sugar.
Do not attempt to diagnose the cause.
---
## HOW TO INTERVIEW ME
Ask me **one question at a time** and wait for each answer.
### Question 1 — The lunch
Ask:
**“Describe a lunch you eat regularly on a normal workday. Include drinks and rough portions if you can. No need to make it sound healthier than it is.”**
### Question 2 — The afternoon
Ask:
**“What time does the dip usually arrive, and what do you actually notice — sleepiness, fogginess, hunger, cravings, irritability or something else? Give each important symptom a rough 0–10 score if you can.”**
### Question 3 — The context
Ask briefly about the factors most likely to confuse our experiment:
**“How has your sleep generally been, and what caffeine do you normally have before and around lunch?”**
Only ask about hydration, morning food, activity or another factor if my answers make it genuinely relevant.
Do not turn this into a health questionnaire.
### Question 4 — My reality
Ask:
**“What part of this lunch is non-negotiable, and how much time, money and effort are you realistically willing to add?”**
Respect my answer.
Do not recommend a completely different meal if I asked you to improve the one I already eat.
---
## BUILD ONE EXPERIMENT
After I answer, briefly separate:
### What we know
Only facts I actually gave you.
### What we cannot know
Include the fact that we cannot determine my glucose response or the cause of my afternoon symptoms from a meal description alone.
### One reasonable hypothesis
Give **one cautious hypothesis** about a feature of the meal or routine that may be worth testing.
Do not present it as established fact.
---
## CHOOSE THE SMALLEST USEFUL CHANGE
Recommend **ONE change first**, not three.
Prefer changes that **add or rebalance** rather than unnecessarily restrict food.
Depending on what I actually eat, reasonable options may include:
* adding a meaningful protein source;
* adding fibre-rich vegetables, beans, whole grains, fruit or another appropriate food;
* making an obviously carbohydrate-heavy meal more balanced;
* modifying meal size if it is unusually large and I am comfortable doing so;
* changing the order of foods as a low-effort experiment;
* or taking a brief, comfortable walk after lunch if appropriate for me.
Do not mechanically recommend these.
Choose only what fits the meal I described.
Do not:
* remove carbohydrates by default;
* prescribe a low-carb diet;
* prescribe calorie targets;
* recommend weight loss;
* label foods “good”, “bad”, “clean” or “cheat” foods;
* tell me to ignore hunger;
* make me buy supplements;
* recommend a continuous glucose monitor;
* create an elaborate meal plan.
Keep my non-negotiables.
---
## MAKE IT A FAIR TEST
Help me run the experiment for approximately **4–5 comparable workdays** where practical.
Change only the chosen variable as much as realistically possible.
Ask me to note, around the time my usual dip occurs:
**ENERGY:** 0–10
**HUNGER:** 0–10
**CRAVING:** 0–10
Optionally note:
**SLEEP LAST NIGHT:** poor / okay / good
Do not make me track calories, macros or glucose unless I explicitly have an appropriate reason and professional guidance to do so.
The purpose is to notice a pattern, not become obsessive about measurement.
---
## REVIEW
If I return after the experiment and tell you what happened:
1. Summarise the pattern cautiously.
2. Do not claim the change caused the result from a few days of self-observation.
3. Notice obvious competing explanations, such as unusually poor sleep.
4. If it clearly seemed useful and was easy to sustain, suggest keeping it for another week.
5. If nothing changed, say so plainly.
6. Then, if I want to continue, suggest **one different variable** to test next.
Do not stack several changes together because then we will not know what mattered.
---
## OUTPUT
After the initial interview, give me only:
### My Current Pattern
[Very brief summary of lunch + afternoon experience.]
### What We Know / What We Don't
[2–4 concise lines.]
### This Week's One Change
[Exactly one realistic change.]
### Why This One
[One cautious sentence.]
### My 3pm Check
**Energy __ /10
Hunger __ /10
Craving __ /10**
### Friday Question
**“Did this version of lunch make my afternoon noticeably better, worse or no different?”**
End with:
**Do not change anything else yet. Let this one experiment give us some information first.**
Keep everything calm, short and practical.
Begin with Question 1 only.
[ End of Prompt ]
The result is not a perfect lunch, it’s one less mystery. Instead of arriving at 3pm, feeling wrecked and thinking your discipline has failed you again, you’ve started learning what your own afternoons respond to.
Maybe lunch is part of it.
Maybe sleep matters more.
Maybe the first experiment results in absolutely nothing.
That’s still information.
So resist the urge to optimise your entire diet by Friday.
Change one thing.
Watch one afternoon.
Listen and learn.
Your body doesn’t need another influencer shouting rules at it, it simply needs you to start paying attention.
The Outcome
The goal is not a perfectly flat glucose curve, it’s much more ordinary than that.
A lunch you still enjoy, followed by an afternoon in which you feel a little more energised, a little less ravenous, and a little less likely to go hunting for emergency caffeine and biscuits at three.
By the end of the week, you should have learned one useful thing about yourself:
“When I change this one part of lunch, does my afternoon feel different?”
If yes, keep it.
If not, put the meal back the way it was and test something else.
Your body is the ultimate feedback loop.
What This Looks Like in Practice
Here’s a hypothetical example.
Imagine someone regularly hits a wall at about 3pm. They are otherwise healthy, have no diagnosed blood-sugar condition, and they want to know whether a small change to the lunch they already eat might make their afternoon feel steadier.
They paste in The 3pm Fix prompt, then, as AI asks each question, they answer like this:
Example ChatGPT chat image 1 of 1
Notice what the AI did‘nt say:
“Your blood sugar is crashing.”
It can’t know that.
Instead, it made one reasonable hypothesis, changed one thing, and let the person's real-life experience decide whether the change deserved to stay.
That’s the whole practice to help you feel energised, focused and ready for more of your day.
Final Thoughts 💭
And there's an even bigger wave crashing over all of this afternoon crash business.
Half the world is now also reaching for a jab, the Ozempics and Wegovys, to control their appetite and blood sugar with medication. For some people it has been disastrous, and for others it has been life-changing, so I won't knock it.
But you, like most of us don't have a broken body, you just have an uninformed one. You’ve been given a meal, told it was healthy, and were never shown the rundown rollercoaster it put you on.
But here’s the thing….
The afternoon crash isn’t a verdict on your discipline. You just don’t have the right information and insight about a ride you didn't know you were even on.
And your body has been trying to tell you the whole time.
The fog at three, the reach for sugar, the flatness on the drive home.
Not moral failures.
Just signals.
A body speaking the only language it has, energy, asking you to listen.
So this week, listen to one meal.
Then let AI translate what your body's been saying.
Soften just one fall.
Not a fad diet.
Not dozens of rules.
Just a steadier, more energised afternoon, and the version of you who gets to come home with something left in the tank.
P.S. What time does your crash hit, and what's the one lunch you'd never, ever give up?
Hit reply and tell me. I might just build a future issue around the meals you can't quit.
The AI Work Handbook That Cuts Your Workday in Half
The 8-hour workday is becoming a 4-hour workday for people who know how to use AI.
Everyone else is still catching up.
This AI work playbook shows you exactly how to cut your work hours in half using AI.
Sign up for Superhuman AI and get:
50+ step-by-step AI tutorials to cut your workload in half — covering every part of your workday, from emails to strategy, used by 1M+ professionals at Google, Microsoft, and NASA
Superhuman AI newsletter (4 min daily) so you keep discovering new AI tools and skills to stay ahead in your career — the playbook is just the start
⚡ STAY WELL | STAY WIRED ⚡
That's it me for this week.
And yes, there's something a bit rich about a former monk writing to you about blood sugar, when for years my idea of managing my energy was another coffee or energy drink. Surely I should have known my own body better, right?
Except that's usually where the trouble starts. You treat the crash as an unchageable fact of the afternoon, something to caffeinate, instead of a signal you can change.
Same lunch.
Same 3pm.
Completely different afternoon.
So this week, don't overhaul your diet; instead take one meal you already eat, hand it to AI, and change one thing.
Nothing dramatic.
No meal plans.
No giving up the good stuff.
Just a softer landing.
And if someone you love disappears into a fog every afternoon, forward this to them. It might give them their afternoon back.
Ps. I think out loud between issues over on @cedricchenefront or @wellwireddaily, where we talk everything AI + wellbeing and self growth.
Talk soon,
Cedric the AI Monk; stay well, stay wired! 🧠⚡
Are You a Wellness Practitioner Drowning in Admin
While AI Sits Unused?
I write a private, twice-monthly brief specifically for professionals like you. Inside you’ll find ways to harness AI to eliminate, delegate or automate your admin (notes, intake, referrals, etc), grow your wellness business and elevate your wellbeing, one working prompt or workflow per issue.
Reply with the word ‘PRO’ & I'll add you.
🤣 AI MEME OF THE WEEK 🤣
📿 A WORD FROM CEDRIC THE AI MONK 📿
Your AI stack should fit your life, not someone else's workflow.
30 minutes. Three specific AI actions mapped to your actual situation. Voice note delivered same day. CDI Award-winning AI design + Zen monk + 4 years in health AI. Full refund if it doesn't deliver.
Disclaimer: None of the content in this newsletter is medical or mental health advice. The content of this newsletter is strictly for information purposes only. The information and eLearning courses provided by Well Wired are not designed as a treatment for individuals experiencing a medical or mental health condition. Nothing in this newsletter should be viewed as a substitute for professional advice (including, without limitation, medical or mental health advice). Well Wired has to the best of its knowledge and belief provided information that it considers accurate, but makes no representation and takes no responsibility as to the accuracy or completeness of any information in this newsletter. Well Wired disclaims to the maximum extent permissible by law any liability for any loss or damage however caused, arising as a result of any user relying on the information in this newsletter.
